News & Insights
BROWSE TOPICS
Navigating Nonprofit Board Issues: Managing Personality Clashes and Vision Differences with Facilitative Tools
United by cause, divided in approach
KEY POINTS
Nonprofit organizations, also known as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), often attract a diverse range of individuals united by a passion, but who may differ widely in personality, vision and approach. Such diversity can be both an asset and a challenge. One critical area where differences become most apparent is within the nonprofit board, where governance and strategic visioning take place.
Understanding how to navigate issues that arise on nonprofit boards, particularly personality clashes and vision differences, is crucial for maintaining organizational health and achieving mission-driven outcomes. In this post, we will explore a few facilitative tools that can be used to keep conversations productive while improving members’ conflict resolution and negotiation skills. Rest assured, it is possible to make sure that your organization not only survives but thrives amidst conflict.
Understanding Conflict Among Nonprofit Board Members
A harmonious board is foundational to the success of any nonprofit. Board members hold significant responsibility in guiding the organization’s mission, financial health and strategic direction. When effectively managed, their collective strengths can propel the nonprofit forward.
It happens that sometimes the same passion that propelled these people to gather around a cause can lead to conflict. This can be seen when looking at some of the most common causes of conflicts in nonprofits:
- Vision differences: Although members are united by the same cause, opinions might diverge on how exactly to get there. Conflicting views on the organization’s direction, priorities or methods can lead to deadlocks in decision-making.
- Personality clashes: If members are aligned on the methods, sometimes differing communication styles, work ethics and interpersonal dynamics can create friction among board members.
- Authority conflicts: Due to the informality of some structures, power struggles may arise when roles and responsibilities are not clearly defined or are contested.
- Resource allocation: Governance challenges in nonprofit organizations can reflect broader ideological divides within the board.
When these conflicts arise—sometimes simultaneously—and are taken to the extreme, the environment quickly becomes toxic, stagnating progress, demoralizing staff and volunteers, and weakening stakeholder confidence.
The good news is that by employing conflict resolution skills and strategies, it is possible to manage and even harness the power of diverse opinions and personalities for the greater good. Let’s go through a few of these tools.
Nonprofits and Conflict Resolution: Facilitative Tools
So, what exactly are facilitative tools? These are usually frameworks, or approaches, that influence the talker, message, environment, receiver or a combination of these to prevent miscommunication. Employing them means participants have a fixed set of rules on how to express themselves while allowing group conclusions to be formed in a way that is acceptable for everyone. For this reason, they can be quite effective at enhancing nonprofit board dynamics.
These techniques are also useful in making sure members acquire basic conflict resolution skills. Below are some of the best facilitation tools for nonprofit boards:
- Pre-meeting preparation:
- Agenda setting: Distribute clear and well-defined agendas before meetings, outlining topics and desired outcomes. This allows board members to arrive prepared and focused.
- Background materials: Provide relevant materials for each topic in advance, allowing for informed discussion and minimizing confusion.
- Icebreakers (optional): Consider starting meetings with light, nonconfrontational activities to break the ice and build rapport.
- Active listening tools:
- Round-robin technique: Ensure everyone gets a chance to voice their opinions by taking turns speaking in a designated order and duration (e.g., one minute per person). This tool is effective to ensure the louder voices in the group don’t overpower the quiet ones, allowing the group to share all the information and ensure that everybody feels heard.
- Paraphrasing: Encourage paraphrasing key points from others' contributions to demonstrate active listening and understanding. This is one of the most used conflict resolution skills, as defenses are lowered when all parties are sure their points have been heard.
- Body language: Train board members to be mindful of their own body language and to interpret others' nonverbal cues to foster better communication.
- Decision-making tools:
- Delphi technique: Facilitate anonymous voting rounds on key issues, allowing for revisions and a more nuanced approach to reaching a consensus. Managing personality clashes in nonprofits becomes easier in this way, as ideas are measured by their own value, with no connection to their owner.
- Weighted voting: A system where votes are weighted based on relevant expertise or experience can be a major asset for resolving vision differences in organizations. If everyone recognizes the experience and weight of certain individuals, this can help finding a solution that everyone sees as valid, even if they don’t agree with the proposal.
- Conflict de-escalation techniques:
- Identify underlying needs: Help board members explore the motivations and interests behind opposing viewpoints to aid understanding and find common ground.
- "I" statements: Encourage the use of "I" statements to express concerns and frustrations constructively, focusing on feelings rather than assigning blame.
- Humor: A well-placed joke or lighthearted comment can diffuse tension and create a more relaxed atmosphere.
- Creative brainstorming techniques:
- Mind mapping: Use a collaborative mind map, such as a white board or Post-its, to visually capture ideas and explore connections between various viewpoints. This also acts as a “brain dump” of ideas and preconceptions, opening space in everyone’s minds for new thoughts and perspectives.
- Brainstorming variations: Implement techniques like "worst-case scenario" or "crazy 8s" to encourage unconventional thinking and generate a wider range of solutions. In the first technique, the worst-case scenario of each approach is considered, identifying the risks and unexpected benefits of each perspective. In the second one, participants are required to jot down as many ideas as possible on a subject, removing the pressure of finding a “perfect” solution and stimulating outside-of-the-box thinking.
These strategies, when well used, can turn a disastrous conversation in moments where emotions are in check and disagreements can be leveraged for more well-rounded opinions. Exercising them regularly is a fantastic way to improve conflict resolution skills, setting the stage for more positive interactions in the long run.
Long-Term Strategies to Address Conflict in Nonprofits
Sometimes eliminating conflict means doing hard work, such as improving governance structures and implementing safeguards such as transparency protocols, accountability measures and regular audits. While the facilitation tools can surely guide interactions toward a positive outcome with your current setup, the following revisions can help turn a dysfunctional board into an effective team.
Building a strong foundation:
- Role clarity: Clearly define expectations and responsibilities for each board member, ensuring everyone understands their contribution and avoids overlap.
- Values alignment: Make sure there is agreement on the organization’s core values and vision and regularly consult them. Ensuring board decisions align with these foundational elements helps prevent disagreements based on conflicting visions.
- Team building: Dedicate time to team-building activities to build trust, understanding and rapport among board members. This fosters a more collaborative environment where open communication becomes the norm.
Improving board communication in nonprofits:
- Open communication channels: Create open communication channels to board members, volunteers and partners such as funders, government representatives and community leaders. This fosters trust and allows for early identification of potential issues.
- Transparency: Practice transparency in decision-making processes and financial reporting. This reduces suspicion and fosters a sense of shared ownership among board members.
- Regular meetings: Schedule regular board meetings with clear agendas and dedicated time for open discussion. This allows for proactive problem-solving and prevents issues from snowballing. Organizers should not hesitate to use the facilitative frameworks we discussed, as they are tools for effective board meetings in nonprofits.
Long-lasting conflict management techniques for nonprofits:
- Ground rules: Establish clear ground rules for respectful communication, active listening and equal participation at the outset.
- Conflict resolution training: If you’re seriously thinking how to improve the conflict resolution skills of members, training from a competent organization is by far the best option. Invest in conflict resolution training for board members. This equips them with skills to address disagreements constructively. Conflict resolution organizations such as JAMS Pathways conduct conflict resolution trainings and offer keynote speaking engagement opportunities.
- Address conflict professionally: If internal attempts to address conflict have failed, consider enlisting a third party that offers conflict resolution services from trained professionals. These programs are the best way to create long-lasting change and break vicious cycles, creating new dynamics and interactions between conflicting parties. At JAMS Pathways, we are experienced in addressing conflict in nonprofits, so visit our Team page to find a facilitator who can support you.
Additional tips:
- Adopt a facilitative leadership style: This type of leadership involves providing direction without taking control, which is highly effective in guiding conflict-prone meetings in a structured way. Promoting facilitative leadership in nonprofit boards yields remarkable results, as it ensures everyone is involved in group decision-making. Plus, it can be used in conjunction with parliamentary procedure.
- Performance reviews: Regularly review board performance and effectiveness. This allows for continuous improvement and identifies areas where conflict might be arising from structural issues.
- Celebrate successes: Recognize and celebrate the board's achievements to maintain morale and build a sense of shared purpose.
Conclusion
Developing a nonprofit board that embraces conflict can be difficult, but the return on investment makes it worthwhile. While disagreements are inevitable, they don't have to become roadblocks, and can even become a way to stimulate creativity and achieve well-rounded decisions. By embracing facilitative tools and strategies that stimulate the necessary conflict resolution skills for nonprofit organizations, boards can navigate personality clashes and vision differences, leading to a more productive and collaborative environment.
Ultimately, fostering open communication, valuing diverse perspectives and employing effective conflict resolution techniques will empower your board to focus on the organization's mission and achieve its goals.
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals.
Start Your Journey Now
Book a Free Discovery Call
Book a discovery call today.